INSTITUTIONAL DYNAMICS AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION: A MULTI-LEVEL CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR INNOVATION-DRIVEN STARTUP ECOSYSTEMS IN VIETNAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62985/j.huit_ojs.vol26.no3E.568Keywords:
Entrepreneurial ecosystem, institutional framework, digital transformation, social capital, emerging markets.Abstract
This paper develops a multi-level conceptual framework to explain how the dynamic interaction of formal and informal institutions shapes innovation-driven startup ecosystems in emerging markets, with particular application to Vietnam's rapidly evolving entrepreneurial landscape. By synthesizing policy, regulatory, and sandbox mechanisms with digital social trust, social capital, and entrepreneurial culture, the model moves beyond static formal–informal dichotomies to capture the causal complexity of contemporary entrepreneurial environments. The framework explicitly incorporates mediating variables (digital transformation, perception, and networking) and moderating factors (sector, region, and degree of internationalization). Thereby, specifying the conditions under which institutional configurations produce differential startup outcomes across lifecycle stages. Three interrelated research questions guide the inquiry, addressing direct institutional effects, mediating transmission mechanisms, and moderating boundary conditions, respectively. A set of nine testable hypotheses is generated, and the framework's explanatory reach is validated through three scenario-based thought experiments drawn from Vietnam's documented regional and sectoral heterogeneity. The study contributes an integrative theoretical architecture suitable for empirical testing via multilevel structural equation modeling or comparative case analysis and offers stage-differentiated policy implications for policymakers and ecosystem actors in digital-transition economies.
References
[1] Z. J. Ács, E. Autio, and L. Szerb, “National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications,” Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 476–494, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
[2] B. Spigel, "The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 49–72, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
[3] E. Stam and B. Spigel, "Entrepreneurial ecosystems," in SAGE Handbook of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, R. Blackburn, D. De Clercq, and J. Heinonen, Eds. London, UK: SAGE, 2018, ch. 21, doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984080.n21
[4] D. J. Isenberg, "How to start an entrepreneurial revolution," Harvard Business Review, Jun. 2010. [Online]. Available: https://growthorientedsustainableentrepreneurship.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/en-how-to-start-an-entrepreneurial-revolution.pdf
[5] E. Autio, S. Nambisan, L. D. W. Thomas, and M. Wright, "Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 72–95, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
[6] J. Björkdahl, "Strategies for digitalization in manufacturing firms," California Management Review, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 17–36, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620920349
[7] A. Kuckertz and L. Brändle, "Creative reconstruction: a structured literature review of the early empirical research on the COVID-19 crisis and entrepreneurship," Management Review Quarterly, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 281–307, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00221-0
[8] A. M. García-Cabrera, M. G. García-Soto, and J. Días-Furtado, “Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Institutional setting and its development,” Innovar, vol. 25, no. 57, pp. 133–156, 2015.
[9] World Economic Forum, "Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics," World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland, Rep., Sep. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EntrepreneurialEcosystems_Report_2013.pdf
[10] B. Feld, Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2020.
[11] E. G. Carayannis and D. F. J. Campbell, "'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem," International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 46, no. 3/4, pp. 201–234, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
[12] J. Rabelo Neto, C. Figueiredo, B. C. Gabriel, and R. Valente, "Factors for innovation ecosystem frameworks: Comprehensive organizational aspects for evolution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 203, p. 123383, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123383
[13] A. A. Vargas-Zeledon and S.-Y. Lee, "Configurations of institutional enablers that foster inclusive entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 9, p. 100549, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100549
[14] Q. H. Thai, K. N. Mai, and T. T. Do, "An evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystem studies: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," SAGE Open, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231153060
[15] A. Ketemaw, S. Zewde, and M. Bogale, "Building entrepreneurship ecosystem: A systematic review," F1000Research, vol. 14, p. 715, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163278.1
[16] Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA), "GEM 2024/2025 global report: Entrepreneurship reality check," GERA, London, UK, Rep., 2025. [Online]. Available: https://gemconsortium.org/report/gem-20242025-global-report-entrepreneurship-reality-check-4
[17] T. T. Tran, N. K. Pham, and Q. V. Le, "Vietnam in transition: The nexus of institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth," SAGE Open, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 21582440251369579, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251369579
[18] S. Kanemoto, T. Sugihara, and M. Tsujimoto, "Attributes of accredited entrepreneurs in emerging economies: Evidence from Vietnam venture capital-backed start-ups," Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 205–225, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-03-2024-0081
[19] M. Bejjani, L. Göcke, and M. Menter, "Digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 189, p. 122337, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122372
[20] D. Tranfield, D. Denyer, and P. Smart, "Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review," British Journal of Management, vol. 14, pp. 207–222, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
[21] E. Jaakkola, "Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches," AMS Review, vol. 10, no. 1–2, pp. 18–26, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
[22] R. Delbridge and P. C. Fiss, "Editors' comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge," Academy of Management Review, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 325–331, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0085
[23] N. K. Denzin, The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2017.
[24] D. C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[25] R. D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY, USA: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
[26] J. S. Coleman, "Social capital in the creation of human capital," American Journal of Sociology, vol. 94, no. S1, pp. S95–S120, 1988, doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
[27] R. A. Sorensen, Thought Experiments. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[28] M. J. Hoogstraaten, K. Frenken, and W. P. C. Boon, "The study of institutional entrepreneurship and its implications for transition studies," Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 36, pp. 114–136, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.05.004
[29] C. Maaßen and D. Urbano, "Institutional environments for circular start-ups: Insights from an entrepreneurial European region," International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 446–479, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426231222562
[30] World Bank Group, Promoting Innovative Entrepreneurship in Viet Nam: An Ecosystem Diagnostic. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2023. Accessed: April. 18, 2026 [Online]. Available: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/0991116231325114
99/pdf/P178764034088f0840b95603af423252410.pdf
[31] Startup Genome and Global Entrepreneurship Network, Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2025. San Francisco, CA, USA: Startup Genome, 2025. Accessed: April. 18, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://startupgenome.com/contents/report/gser-2025_4786.pdf
[32] M. Hirschmann, "One size does not fit all: Sustainable innovation, climate policy, and startups' growth aspirations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 215, p. 124069, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124069
[33] N. D. Duong, "Startup innovation in Vietnam: Theory and practice," Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 146–158, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2024.15.01.017
[34] Vietnam National Innovation Center (NIC) and Do Ventures, Vietnam Innovation and Tech Investment Report 2023. Hanoi, Vietnam: NIC, 2023. Accessed: April. 18, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://nic.gov.vn/img/wpuploads/2023/04/ENG_Vietnam-Innovation-Tech-Investment-Report2023_final.pdf
[35] B. Wurth, E. Stam, and B. Spigel, "Toward an entrepreneurial ecosystem research program," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 729–778, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948
[36] Y. Huang et al, "Opportunity or necessity entrepreneurship? A study based on the national system of entrepreneurship," Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 4, art. no. 100448, Oct.-Dec. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100448
[37] J. Zhuang and H. Sun, "Perceived institutional environment and entrepreneurial behavior: The mediating role of risk-taking propensity and moderating role of human capital factors," SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1-15, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241233950
[38] T. N. B. Nguyen and D. D. Nguyen, "Vietnam's regulatory sandboxes: Paving the way for digital innovation," Tilleke & Gibbins. [Online]. Available: https://www.tilleke.com/insights/vietnams-regulatory-sandboxes-paving-the-way-for-digital-innovation/
[39] T. T. T. Bui et al, "Intention toward sustainable entrepreneurship in Vietnam," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 435–456, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-04-2024-0074
[40] R. Bläse et al, "Identifying institutional gaps: Implications for an early‐stage support framework for impact entrepreneurs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 679–697, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2939
[41] E. Mack and H. Mayer, "The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Urban Studies, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2118–2133, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547
