INNOVATION AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES IN THE FAST-MOVING CONSUMER GOODS SECTOR: THE ROLE OF LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62985/j.huit_ojs.vol26.no3E.566Keywords:
Innovation, business performance, leadership, organizational learning, small and medium-sized enterprises, fast-moving consumer goods.Abstract
This study investigates how innovation improves the business performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector in Ho Chi Minh City, with particular attention to the enabling roles of leadership and organizational learning. Drawing on the resource-based view and dynamic capabilities perspective, the study develops a sequential mediation model linking leadership, organizational learning, innovation, and business performance. Survey data were collected from 270 owners and chief executive officers of SMEs in the food and beverage segment and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that innovation has a positive influence on business performance, especially in an environment characterized by short product life cycles, intense competition, and rapid shifts in distribution channels. Leadership strengthens innovation by setting strategic priorities and allocating resources, while organizational learning helps firms acquire, share, and institutionalize market knowledge. More importantly, the findings reveal a sequential mechanism in which leadership enhances organizational learning, which in turn promotes innovation and ultimately improves business performance. The study offers practical implications for SME managers seeking to build innovation-oriented leadership and learning systems.
References
[1] OECD and Eurostat, Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th ed. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
[2] D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509-533, 1997, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
[3] D. J. Teece, "Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1319-1350, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
[4] J. Barney, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage," Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99-120, 1991, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
[5] N. Rosenbusch, J. Brinckmann, and A. Bausch, "Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs," Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 441-457, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
[6] D. Jiménez-Jiménez and R. Sanz-Valle, "Innovation, organizational learning, and performance," Journal of Business Research, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 408-417, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
[7] G. P. Huber, "Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures," Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 88-115, 1991, doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
[8] R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, "The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance," Harvard Business Review, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 71-79, Jan.-Feb. 1992. https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2.
[9] L. Gumusluoglu and A. Ilsev, "Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation," Journal of Business Research, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 461-473, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.001
[10] D. V. Le, H. T. T. Le, T. T. Pham, and L. V. Vo, “Innovation and SMEs performance: Evidence from Vietnam,” Applied Economic Analysis, vol. 31, no. 92, pp. 90–108, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEA-04-2022-0121.
[11] V. T. H. Nhung and N. T. H. Huong, "The role of government support on SMEs innovation: Evidence in Vietnam," Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 120-134, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.24311/jabes/2022.33.07.08
[12] W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 128-152, 1990, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
[13] M. M. Crossan, H. W. Lane, and R. E. White, "An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution," Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 522-537, 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135
[14] J. A. Schumpeter, The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1934, https://cruel.org/books/hy/shortschumpeter/SchumpeterTheoryofEconDev.pdf
[15] M. Indrawati, I. Prasetyo, and R. Rusdiyanto, "The role of innovation capability in mediating the effect of customer relationship management and market orientation on SME performance," Problems and Perspectives in Management, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 274-291, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(1).2026.19
[16] G. G. Dess and R. B. Robinson Jr., "Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 265-273, 1984, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050306
[17] P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, "Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies," Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 879-903, 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[18] H. T. Dang, N. T. Tran, and H. T. Truong, "Studying the relationship between transformational leadership, organizational learning, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: An empirical study in Vietnamese small and medium enterprises," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1140-1155, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.55214/2576-8484.v9i11.11074
[19] I. Nonaka, "A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation," Organization Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14-37, 1994, doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
[20] C. Argyris and D. A. Schön, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
[21] P. M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY, USA: Doubleday/Currency, 1990.
[22] M. Hael, F. A. Belhaj, and H. Zhang, "Organizational learning and innovation: A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda," Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 11, Art. no. e31812, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31812
[23] J. F. Hair Jr. et al, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2017. https://www.pls-sem.net/downloads/2nd-edition-a-primer-on-pls-sem/
[24] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error," Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39-50, 1981, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[25] J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, "A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115-135, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
