THE INFLUENCE OF FOMO ON IMPULSE BUYING BEHAVIOR: CONSTRUCTING SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION HABITS FOR VIETNAMESE MIDDLE-AGED CONSUMERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62985/j.huit_ojs.vol26.no3E.551Keywords:
Consumer behavior, fear of missing out, impulse buying, middle-aged consumers, sustainable consumption.Abstract
Digital retail environments increasingly combine scarcity cues, livestream interaction, algorithmic recommendations, and visible peer behavior, creating conditions in which fear of missing out (FOMO) can accelerate unplanned purchasing. Research has concentrated primarily on younger consumers, leaving the implications for middle-aged consumers in emerging markets insufficiently specified. This study examines the mechanisms through which FOMO can intensify impulse buying and identifies intervention points for sustainable consumption among Vietnamese middle-aged consumers. To avoid unsupported primary-data claims in the earlier version, the revised study adopts a structured integrative review and theory-building synthesis. Nineteen substantive peer-reviewed studies published from 2022 to 2025 were retained after relevance and verifiability screening; all sources have DOI or stable journal records. Evidence was coded for digital stimuli, FOMO-related psychological responses, impulsive or compulsive outcomes, life-stage factors, Vietnam-specific context, and sustainability implications, and then interpreted through stimulus-organism-response logic, social comparison, and self-regulation. The synthesis indicates that scarcity, social visibility, anticipated regret, and low-friction checkout compress deliberation. For middle-aged consumers, susceptibility is likely to be expressed through value-preserving rationalization: an unplanned purchase is reframed as thrift, household usefulness, or avoidance of a lost opportunity. Repeated exposure may normalize excess acquisition and conflict with financial and environmental sustainability. Sustainable consumption therefore depends on consumer-level pause routines, transparent platform design, and proportionate oversight of manipulative urgency. The study contributes a context-sensitive agenda for empirical research on Vietnamese consumers aged approximately 40-59.
References
[1] A. Redine et al., “Impulse buying: A systematic literature review and future research directions,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 3-41, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12862
[2] V. D. Tran, “Consumer impulse buying behavior: The role of confidence as moderating effect,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 6, Art. no. e09672, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09672
[3] T. T. A. Ngo et al., “A comprehensive study on factors influencing online impulse buying behavior: Evidence from Shopee video platform,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 15, Art. no. e35743, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35743
[4] H. T. Luong et al., “Online impulsive and compulsive buying behavior in Vietnam,” International Journal of Management and Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 365-379, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.18488/11.v12i3.3446
[5] A. D. Pham et al., “How do live-stream channels shape impulse buying behaviour? Empirical research on Vietnamese youth,” Asia Pacific Business Review, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 567-592, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2023.2265320
[6] J. Zhang et al., “The impact of scarcity on consumers’ impulse buying based on the S-O-R theory,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 792419, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792419
[7] T. C. T. Dinh and Y. Lee, “‘I want to be as trendy as influencers’ - how ‘fear of missing out’ leads to buying intention for products endorsed by social media influencers,” Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 346-364, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-04-2021-0127
[8] T. C. T. Dinh, M. Wang, and Y. Lee, “How does the fear of missing out moderate the effect of social media influencers on their followers’ purchase intention?”, SAGE Open, vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231197259
[9] S. Kumar and S. Kumar, “Compulsive use of social media and unrestrained buying behavior: Delineating the role of social comparison, fear of missing out and self esteem,” Journal of Internet Commerce, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 503-532, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2024.2421731
[10] S. Hussain et al., “Fear of missing out and compulsive buying behavior: The moderating role of mindfulness,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 75, Art. no. 103512, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103512
[11] R. Bläse et al., “Non-sustainable buying behavior: How the fear of missing out drives purchase intentions in the fast fashion industry,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 626-641, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3509
[12] P. Nangia, S. Bansal, and P. Thaichon, “Doing more with less: An integrative literature review on responsible consumption behaviour,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 141-155, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2163
[13] J. A. Vargas-Merino et al., “Sustainable consumption: Conceptualization and characterization of the complexity of ‘being’ a sustainable consumer - a systematic review of the scientific literature,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 10, Art. no. 8401, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108401
[14] Y. Tan et al., “More mindfulness, less conspicuous consumption? Evidence from middle-aged Chinese consumers,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 69, Art. no. 103096, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103096
[15] Q. Yi, J. Khan, Y. Su, and S. Zhao, “Impulse buying tendency in live-stream commerce: The role of viewing frequency and anticipated emotions influencing scarcity-induced purchase decision,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 75, Art. no. 103534, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103534
[16] X. Gong and X. Jiang, “Understanding consumer impulse buying in livestreaming commerce: The product involvement perspective,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, Art. no. 1104349, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104349
[17] S. Miranda et al., “To buy or not to buy? The impulse buying dilemma in livestream shopping,” Psychology & Marketing, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 989-1005, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21967
[18] T. T. H. Trang and M. Pyo, “The effect of FoMO in Shopee E-Commerce on herd behavior in Vietnam,” Southeast Asia Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 3-33, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.21485/hufsea.2024.34.3.001
[19] N. Onel, “Transforming consumption: The role of values, beliefs, and norms in promoting four types of sustainable behavior,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 491-513, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2212
[20] A. M. Kutcher and V. T. LeBaron, “A simple guide for completing an integrative review using an example article,” Journal of Professional Nursing, vol. 40, pp. 13-19, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.02.004
[21] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG),” Palliative Medicine, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 608-616, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241234800
