THE IMPACT OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON EMPLOYEES’ JOB SATISFACTION: EVIDENCE FROM VIETCOMBANK – BINH TAY BRANCH, VIETNAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62985/j.huit_ojs.vol26.no3E.518Từ khóa:
Knowledge management practices, job satisfaction, Vietcombank, exploratory factor analysis, Regression analysis.Tóm tắt
This study examines the relationship between knowledge management (KM) practices and employees’ job satisfaction at Vietcombank - Binh Tay Branch. Data were collected from 200 employees to examine five KM practices: knowledge creation, accumulation, sharing, application, and acquisition. The results show that all scales are reliable, with Cronbach’s α ranging from 0.817 to 0.902. EFA identifies five KM factors, which explain 69.957% of the total variance. The regression results show that all five KM practices have a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction (R² = 0.537; F = 45.049; p<0.001). Knowledge creation has the strongest effect (β = 0.325). The results show that better KM practices can improve employees’ job satisfaction and may also contribute to better service quality and organizational performance in the banking sector.
Tài liệu tham khảo
[1] G. D. Bhatt, “Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 68–75, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110384419
[2] I. Nonaka, “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14–37, 1994, doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
[3] [3] I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 1995.
[4] V. H. Vroom, Work and Motivation. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1964.
[5] P. E. Spector, Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 1997, doi: http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231549
[6] J. Abbas and M. Sağsan, “Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 229, pp. 611–620, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.024
[7] T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
[8] D. Palacios-Marqués and F. J. Garrigós-Simón, “The effect of knowledge management practices on firm performance,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 143–156, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610670911
[9] T. H. Davenport and S. C. Völpel, “The rise of knowledge towards attention management,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 212–221, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110400816
[10] J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2010.
[11] J. Pallant, SPSS Survival Manual, 7th ed. London, U.K.: McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.
[12] B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: HarperCollins, 1996.
[13] Z. Zamir, “The impact of knowledge capture and knowledge sharing on learning, adaptability, job satisfaction and staying intention: A study of the banking industry in Bangladesh,” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v7i1.87
[14] A. H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality. New York, NY, USA: Harper & Row, 1954.
[15] F. Afiouni, “Human resource management and knowledge management: A road map toward improving organizational performance,” Journal of the American Academy of Business, Cambridge, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 124 - 130, 2007.
[16] M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1966.
