INFORMATION TRANSPARENCY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GREEN BOND MARKET IN LISTED FIRMS IN VIETNAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62985/j.huit_ojs.vol26.no3E.651Từ khóa:
Finance, accounting, environmental, social and governance (ESG), green bond market, information transparency (ITR).Tóm tắt
This study investigates information transparency in the development of the green bond market among listed firms in Vietnam within the context of digital transformation, artificial intelligence, and increasing global financial integration. Using primary survey data collected from 305 financial professionals and accountants, the study applies reliability analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to assess the measurement of transparency. The results indicate that information transparency remains at a moderate level, with mean values ranging from 2.984 to 3.482. The measurement scale demonstrates acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.763) and construct validity (KMO = 0.754; explained variance = 58.504%). The findings highlight that compliance with international disclosure standards and consistency in financial and environmental reporting are critical components of transparency. From a theoretical perspective, the study supports signaling and agency theories in explaining the role of transparency in reducing information asymmetry. Practically, the results suggest that firms should adopt digital technologies and AI-based reporting systems to enhance disclosure quality, while policymakers should strengthen ESG-related regulatory frameworks. The study contributes to the literature on sustainable finance by providing firm-level evidence from an emerging market context.
Tài liệu tham khảo
[1] M. Spence, “Job market signaling,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 355–374, Aug. 1973. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
[2] M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling, “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305–360, Oct. 1976, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
[3] R. E. Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman, 1984.
[4] I. Jankovic, V. Vasic, and V. Kovacevic, “Does transparency matter? Evidence from panel analysis of the EU government green bonds,” Energy Economics, vol. 114, p. 106325, Oct. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106325
[5] Y. Tang, B. Wang, N. Pan, and Z. Li, “The impact of environmental information disclosure on the cost of green bond: Evidence from China,” Energy Economics, vol. 126, p. 107008, Oct. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107008
[6] J. Yang, Y. Shi, L. Zhang, and S. Hu, “The influence of environmental information transparency of green bond on credit rating,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 58, p. 104410, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104410.
[7] H. Wang and S. Jiang, “Green bond issuance and stock price informativeness,” Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 79, pp. 120–133, Sep. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.011
[8] E. Allman and B. Lock, “External Reviews and Green Bond Credibility,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4146237
[9] E. Allman and B. Lock, “External Reviews and Green Bond Credibility,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4146237
[10] P. M. Healy and K. G. Palepu, “Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 31, no. 1–3, pp. 405–440, Sep. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0
[11] P. M. Healy and K. G. Palepu, “Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 31, no. 1–3, pp. 405–440, Sep. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0
[12] J. F. Hair et al, Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
[13] J. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, và R. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. New York, USA: Pearson Prentice-Hall, 2010.
[14] J. F. Hair et al., "Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann," Organizational Research Methods, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 182-209, 2014.
