FRAUD DETECTION IN FINTECH AND DIGITAL PAYMENTS USING A HYBRID MODEL COMBINING MACHINE LEARNING AND RISK MONITORING

Authors

  • Do Thi Thuy Nga College of Foreign Economic Relations, Ho Chi Minh City Corresponding Author
  • Nguyen Thi Hai Hang College of Foreign Economic Relations, Ho Chi Minh City Author
  • Pham Thi Thanh Hoa College of Foreign Economic Relations, Ho Chi Minh City Author
  • Vu Van Dong Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade Author
  • Huynh Thi Huong Thao Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62985/j.huit_ojs.vol26.no3E.648

Keywords:

Fraud detection, digital payment, XGBoost, SMOTE, risk monitoring.

Abstract

The rapid development of Fintech and digital payments has increased the need for effective fraud detection and risk monitoring. This study evaluates fraud detection performance using imbalanced credit card transaction data. It compares Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost, with XGBoost combined with SMOTE as the main approach. The dataset contains anonymized transaction features, where fraudulent transactions account for only a very small proportion of total observations. Model performance is assessed using Precision, Recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and confusion matrix analysis. The empirical results show that each model reflects a different fraud detection profile. Logistic Regression achieves high Recall but produces many false alerts. Random Forest controls false alerts more effectively and achieves the highest Precision and F1-score. XGBoost achieves the highest ROC-AUC and maintains higher Recall than Random Forest, indicating a more suitable balance for reducing missed fraud cases while controlling false alerts. The findings provide empirical evidence for the value of combining XGBoost with SMOTE in handling class imbalance. They also suggest that model outputs can be linked with Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to support early warning and transaction risk monitoring in digital payment environments.

References

[1] Financial Stability Board, “FinTech and market structure in financial services: Market developments and potential financial stability implications,” Feb. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P140219.pdf

[2] World Bank Group, “Payment systems worldwide: A snapshot,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/115211594375402373/pdf/A-Snapshot.pdf

[3] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements, “Digital fraud and banking: Supervisory and financial stability implications,” Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d558.pdf

[4] European Central Bank and European Banking Authority, “2024 report on payment fraud,” Aug. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/intro/publications/pdf/ecb.ebaecb202408.en.pdf

[5] E. W. T. Ngai, Y. Hu, Y. H. Wong, Y. Chen, and X. Sun, “The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 559–569, Feb. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.006

[6] L. H. Aros, L. X. B. Molano, F. Gutierrez-Portela, J. J. M. Hernandez, and M. S. R. Barrero, “Financial fraud detection through the application of machine learning techniques: A literature review,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 1130, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03606-0

[7] T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2016, pp. 785–794, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

[8] N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 16, pp. 321–357, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953

[9] T. T. D. Truong and H. T. Le, “Machine learning based bankruptcy prediction of Vietnam companies,” Journal of Economics & Development, no. 310, pp. 44–53, Apr. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33301/JED.VI.1066

[10] Machine Learning Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, “Credit card fraud detection,” Kaggle, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mlg-ulb/creditcardfraud

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Economics

How to Cite

Do Thi Thuy Nga, Nguyen Thi Hai Hang, Pham Thi Thanh Hoa, Vu Van Dong, & Huynh Thi Huong Thao. (2026). FRAUD DETECTION IN FINTECH AND DIGITAL PAYMENTS USING A HYBRID MODEL COMBINING MACHINE LEARNING AND RISK MONITORING. HUIT Journal of Science, 26(3E), 2531. https://doi.org/10.62985/j.huit_ojs.vol26.no3E.648