KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION  IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM VIETNAM

Authors

  • Tran Quang Binh Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade Author
  • Ho Thanh Tri Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62985/j.huit_ojs.vol26.no3E.598

Keywords:

Knowledge management, innovation capability, higher education, university autonomy.

Abstract

In the context of increasing university autonomy, digital transformation, and international integration in Vietnam, strengthening innovation capability has become an important strategic priority for higher education institutions. Knowledge management (KM), encompassing knowledge creation, sharing, storage, and application, provides a critical mechanism through which universities can transform individual and organizational knowledge into innovative outcomes. Despite its growing importance, KM practices in Vietnamese universities remain relatively fragmented, while empirical evidence on how different KM processes contribute to institutional innovation is still limited. This study investigates the effects of four key KM processes knowledge creation, knowledge sharing, knowledge storage, and knowledge application on innovation capability in teaching, research, and organizational management. Data were collected from 312 lecturers and managers across 16 public and private universities in Vietnam and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings demonstrate that all four KM processes have positive effects on university innovation capability, with knowledge application and knowledge sharing emerging as the most influential factors. The analysis also reveals significant differences between public and private universities, suggesting that institutional context shapes the effectiveness of KM practices in fostering innovation. By providing empirical evidence from the Vietnamese higher education sector, this study extends the understanding of the KM innovation relationship in an emerging higher education context. The findings also offer practical implications for university leaders seeking to develop more integrated KM systems, strengthen knowledge-sharing cultures, and leverage institutional knowledge to support university autonomy, digital transformation, and sustainable innovation.

References

[1] Nguyen Thi Phuong & Tran Huu Tai, “Knowledge management in public organizations and its application in higher education,” Journal of Public Administration Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2020

[2] Fullwood, R., Rowley, J., & Delbridge, R. “Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities.” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol.17, no. 1, pp. 123–136, 2013, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300831

[3] Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., “The Knowledge-Creating Company,” Oxford University Press, 1995, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001

[4] Ministry of Education and Training – MOET. Vietnam Higher Education Digital Transformation Report. Hanoi, Vietnam. 2023

[5] Davenport, T.H., and Prusak, L., “Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know,” Harvard Business School Press, 1998, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/347634.348775

[6] Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’este, P., ... & Sobrero, M, “Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations.” Research policy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 423-442, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007

[7] Donnellan, John, and Wanda L. Rutledge. "A case for resource‐based view and competitive advantage in banking." Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 40, no.6, pp. 728-737, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3041

[8] Bromiley, Philip, and Devaki Rau. "Operations management and the resource based view: Another view." Journal of operations management, vol. 41, pp. 95-106, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.003

[9] Huang, Kuo‐Feng, et al. "From temporary competitive advantage to sustainable competitive advantage." British journal of management, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 617-636, 2015, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12104

[10] Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management." Strategic management journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509-533, 1997, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

[11] Eisenhardt, K.M., & Martin, J.A. “Dynamic capabilities: What are they?” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 10–11, pp. 1105–1121, 2000, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11%3C1105::AID-SMJ133%3E3.0.CO;2-E

[12] Lee, H., & Choi, B., "Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination." Journal of management information systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 179-228, 2003

[13] Yusuf, M., & Derus, A. “Diffusion of innovation in organizations.” International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 134–149, 2013

[14] Ali, M., et al., “Innovation adoption in organizations.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 146, pp. 421–430, 2019

[15] Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G . “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities.” Organization science, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 339-351, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780

[16] Kogut, Bruce, and Udo Zander. "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology." Organization science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 383-397, 1992, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383

[17] Grant, Robert M. "Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm." Strategic management journal, vol. 17, no. S2, pp. 109-122, 1996, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

[18] Gold, Andrew H., Arvind Malhotra, and Albert H. Segars. "Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective." Journal of management information systems, vol. 18, no. 1 , pp. 185-214, 2001, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669

[19] Kiessling, Timothy S., et al. "Exploring knowledge management to organizational performance outcomes in a transitional economy." Journal of world business, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 421-433, 2009, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2008.11.006

[20] Donate, Mario J., and Jesús D. Sánchez de Pablo. "The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation." Journal of business research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 360-370, 2015, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.022

[21] Ramayah, T., Samat, N., & Lo, M.C. “Knowledge management and service innovation in higher education.” International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 30, no. 6, pp.1032–1049, 2016

[22] Galgotia, A., & Lakshmi, V. “Knowledge management practices in public and private universities.” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 742–758, 2022

[23] Rehman, Ubaid Ur, and Amjad Iqbal. "Nexus of knowledge-oriented leadership, knowledge management, innovation and organizational performance in higher education." Business Process Management Journal, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1731-1758, 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2019-0274

[24] Iqbal, A., Latif, K.F., Marimon, F., & Sahibzada, U.F. “From knowledge management to innovation capability.” European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 399–421, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-04-2018-0083

[25] Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of multivariate data analysis, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 107-123, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmda.2017.087624

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Issue

Section

Economics

How to Cite

Tran Quang Binh, & Ho Thanh Tri. (2026). KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION  IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM VIETNAM. HUIT Journal of Science, 26(3E), 1900. https://doi.org/10.62985/j.huit_ojs.vol26.no3E.598